Tag Archives: apple

Links

iPod at five

It seemed to take pretty much everyone by surprise. Techie-oriented website Slashdot greeted the introduction of the iPod with the words: “No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.” Even I, on the way home from Tottenham Court Road with a first generation, 5Gb model, thought, “What have I done? I’ve just paid ?350 for a walkman!” And I did wonder about the name.

But we all underestimated Apple. Five years later and now it’s difficult to see someone on the London Underground without an iPod and they’ve captured the public imagination in a way that few products have in recent times.

Photos: iPod through the years | CNET News.com

I still think it’s one of the best gadgets I’ve ever bought. It’s amazing that they got so much right on that very first model.

Opinion

.Mac Defection

The premise

I have become increasingly disaffected by Apple’s .Mac service, so much so that when I recently got an email congratulating me for subscribing for another year I immediately went to the website and cancelled.

The background

But before we start going into all the details, what is .Mac? Basically it’s Apple’s on-line services that are geared for Mac users but are also usable by those stuck in the Microsoft world. When I first got my iBook back in 2001 it was called iTools. It had a more limited set of features back then, but that included a something@mac.com email address.

That changed in 2002 when they renamed it .Mac and suddenly started charging for it. They added a few extra features as a sweetener but at the time I just let my free membership lapse as it just wasn’t worth paying for.

Over time they added new functionality. There’s the iDisk, an on-line disk, synchronised over the internet to all your computers. You can synchronise your mail, address book, calendar and Safari bookmarks. There’s easy web hosting which has grown more sophisticated over time and now includes a “Groups” feature which is blog-ish.

Issues at stake

For me .Mac only became worth paying for when I added a new Mac to the home mix. As a desktop machine, the iMac had a bright big display but my iBook would still get some use as my only portable machine. The idea of having my documents, address book and Safari bookmarks seamlessly synchronised between the two machines was worth paying for. The web hosting had some value — it’s nice being able to quickly publish a few pictrues for friends for example — but I certainly wouldn’t pay for that with so many free alternative.

And for a while it was great.

But then bad things started to happen.

The first worth mentioning is reliability. I work in IT so I have reasonable expectations, I understand that nothing has 100% reliability. However it seems that .Mac is always having technical problems. Some affect all users, some affect all services, most just touch certain parts of the system. In short, for a paid service that it supposed to add convenience I find that it’s something that I can’t rely on.

Closely connected to relability is the how well the service functions when it’s up and running. That, it turns out, is surprisingly badly. Often Apple products have glitches on their first release, but .Mac has been around for years. However the syncing, the main feature that I subscribed for, has not worked correctly for at least a year. Apple always suggest removing all the sync info from one machine and refreshing fully from the network.

This is not a good idea for two reasons. Firstly it’s not much of a “synchronisation” if you have to delete everything on one computer. Secondly, even after doing that information fails to sync correctly. I have a few theories where their software may be going wrong but I won’t get into them here. The point is that it plain doesn’t work and it shouldn’t take someone with a Computer Science degree to theorise why it might be broken. Apple’s sell based on their “Just Works” reputation, something that clearly does not apply in this case.

The one part of the syncing that generally does work is the iDisk. However it seems to cause both my machines to beach-ball far more frequently than my wifes G4. My G3 iBook I could forgive, but my G5 is substantially faster than her machine. I don’t see why I should wait longer than her just to save a file!

Alternatives

Now comes the clincher.

Can we replace .Mac email? Yes, that’s easy. Everything from my ISP, to GMail to specific email hosts.

How about .Mac web hosting? That’s a piece of cake. If anything there are many more hosting options.

The iDisk, on the other hand, has been more problematic. There are alternatives but they mostly seem to fall short in some measure. The .Mac service is a simple WebDAV server, most of the others seem more complex. I think what I’m going to end up doing is either emailing myself documents or occasionally using rsync.

Similarly, .Mac syncing appears more difficult to replace than I ever imagined. The obvious alternative is something like del.ic.icio.us, but I like my bookmarks in my browser and not on a web-page. There are tools to upload and download the links to Safari but there currently does not appear to be one that syncs both ways. (I think there are Firefox plugins that do this. It’s a shame that I prefer Safari!)

Overall I think it’s odd that there are no direct competitors to .Mac. Most of the pieces are out there but I have, so far, been unable to find one solution that bundles all, or even most, of the components.

Conclusion

All this is to say that moving away will result in some frustration, and where there’s frustration there is, I’m sure, money to be made. I think Apple are shooting themselves in the foot by neglecting .Mac. Software such as most of the iLife suite pushes people to the convenience of .Mac but once you join up the reality lets you down.

Let’s assume that .Mac worked as advertised. Would I subscribe? Yes. They’ve had two years subscription fees from me; I’ve put my money where my mouth is. I do think it’s over-priced as many of the components are available for free elsewhere. But for the convenience and its seamless interface in OS X and iLife (iPhoto in particular) I’m prepared to bite the bullet. However, for a service that does not work correctly, nearly ?70 a year is far too much.

Links

Microsoft says Zune to sell for $249

I’ve refrained from commenting about Microsoft’s iPod competitor so far as it’s not much of a challenge to mock it when they decide to make one model dung-coloured.

However this article caught my eye:

AppleInsider | Microsoft says Zune to sell for $249

What the headline doesn’t tell you is that they are planning to make a loss on each unit to make that price-point, just like they do on each XBox games console. I can’t think of many other companies that would make a loss of $388 million in one quarter and consider that to be a good strategy worth replicating for another product.

Links

Apple Envy

Most people that know me are aware that I tend to favour the Macintosh over Microsoft Windows. One of the problems with maintaining such a position is that people are always saying how much more expensive Apple products are. While I realise that a single example is not likely to change that, maybe people should look at this Windows XP Media Center PC before throwing stones. A snip at ?5,980,000.00.

If anyone wants to buy me a Mac Pro and a 30″ monitor with their change I won’t argue.

Photography

Photo Book Group Test (Part 4)

2 Comments

Since MyPublisher use the same interface as Apple they are really only able to differentiate themselves on two grounds: print quality and delivery times. How did they do?

Well, the dispatch notification came on the 29th June which is quick but not as fast as Apple. Unfortunately the book arrived on 8th July, which was five days behind Apple and a full week behind PhotoBox.

But what is the book like now that it has arrived?

It’s nice. In fact, if you go read my comments on the Apple book you’ll have a very good idea of what MyPublisher have done. The presentation is very similar, and, in terms of quality, it’s not easy to tell them apart. The main differences are that the MyPublisher has a vellum-like page before the photo pages, while Apple has a patterned sheet of paper. It’s a nice touch. And secondly the branding is slightly less obvious. No logo, just a bar code on the penultimate page and the website URL on the last page, no “Made on a Mac” text or logo.

So, given that the quality is broadly comparable and the delivery is slower, what reason is there to use MyPublisher rather than Apple? I’m still wondering. There’s nothing really wrong with the final product but currently they appear not to have any compelling advantage over Apple.

See:

Photography

Photo Book Group Test (Part 3)

1 Comment

Apple were the first off the block. At 9am on the 27th June I receieved an email noting that my photo book had been dispatched. For some reason they are printed and mailed from “abroad” (with a Dutch customs declaration, the value in US Dollars and a German postmark) which explains why it took until 3rd July to arrive. Unfortunately I was out when it first came, so I didn’t actually pick it up until the 5th.

So how does it compare with the PhotoBox book that arrived last Saturday? It arrived in typical Apple fashion. Inside an ordinary card box is a white card box with the normal Apple branding. Inside, wrapped in clear plastic, is the book.

The book itself is black and nicely bound. Rather than having a hole in the cover showing a print on the first page, Apple chose to have a photo (and some text) bound to the cover. Since this is a book of our wedding, it’s nice to have a description of what it is on the front. Similarly, the first page is a text page of credits, an option that wasn’t available with PhotoBox.

The photo’s are pretty much as good as those in the PhotoBox book, and possibly higher quality than the Vietnam photo-book from last year (but since they’re different bindings — hard cover as opposed to soft — it’s difficult to give a direct comparison). The problem with the varying colours seen in the PhotoBox book is still present in the Apple version but not as pronounced. The Apple branding in the book is more pronounced than with PhotoBox but it still fairly subtle: the very last page has an Apple logo and says “Made on a Mac.”

Overall this is the best of the two books seen so far. The quality is at least as good, if not better because the colour balance, and the presentation is better. MyPublisher will have to be very impressive to beat Apple’s efforts.

See: