Category Archives: Blog

General thoughts on life, the universe and everything. Stuff that doesn’t fit in the other categories!

WWDC 2009

WWDC 2009 Apple Logo
WWDC 2009 Apple Logo

Ever since I’ve been “into” Macs, Apple’s World Wide Developer Conference has been a draw. As an iPhone developer this years was especially interesting to me. Unfortunately it’s not a full time job to me so it was hard to justify the time off work or the expense of the ticket.

I was, however, in the Bay Area just before the event and managed to have a quick walk around Moscone. I felt a bit geeky taking pictures of a trade conference, but I wasn’t the only one doing so and I didn’t have my nose pressed against the glass unlike certain people!

WWDC 2009 Icons
WWDC 2009 Icons

I took a look at all the icons outside. I didn’t see Yummy, though.

New Look

If you’re a regular visitor you will note that the ZX81 has an exciting new look and feel. It has never looked more like a real ZX81. It’s also about as usable as a real ZX81, though it does have more memory available and the wobbly RAM pack is likely to be less of a concern.

I’m currently running it as a one day trial but may extend if popular. Please let me know what you think.

Update:

Due to popular demand, I have reverted to the old look-and-feel for ZX81. People seemed to think the new visuals introduced yesterday was an April Fool…

If you missed it, here’s what this page looked like:

How ZX81.org.uk looked yesterday
How ZX81.org.uk looked yesterday

Atheist Pride Day

Apparently today is “Atheist Pride Day.” You are supposed to “change your Facebook profile picture to the [Out Campaign Logo] And change your status to something like ‘I am an atheist’ (or whatever).” I’m not on FaceBook so you’ll have to make do with this little post.

Atheist Out Campaign
Atheist Out Campaign

It turns out that the timing is quite good, too. Last night I went to a British Humanist Association talk by Daniel Dennett called “A Darwinian Perspective on Religions: Past, Present and Future.” It was chaired by Richard Dawkins. Here’s a fuzzy iPhone picture of the Q&A session at the end. (If only I’d brought my 50D!)

Dennett and Dawkins at the BHA
Dennett and Dawkins at the BHA

It was a fascinating talk about how successful languages and religions evolve over time. He covered a lot of ground in an engaging, entertaining and witty manner. Great stuff. What better way to show my atheist pride?

Why would you want an ID card?

Did you see today’s press release from the Home Office about how great ID cards are? Despite any evidence that this actually happens, they keep asserting that people can’t wait to get their hands on them. Everyone is so keen that they’re going to start issuing them to volunteers before the 2012 official start.

It seems that they’re backing off a little on the anti-terrorist claims, but here is the new list of benefits.

In her speech she stressed that in those areas where identity cards are delivered first residents, businesses, local authorities and others will reap the rewards the cards bring including:

  • a universal and simple proof of identity that brings convenience for organisations and individuals ? that means an end to the disorganised use of photocopied bank statements, phone bills and birth certificates
  • the Service will give you control of who can see your personal details ? that means an end to revealing details about your finances or personal life just to prove who you are and where you live
  • ensuring that foreign nationals living, working and studying here legally are able to easily prove their identity and prevent those here illegally from benefiting from the privileges of Britain
  • convenient travel in Europe using the identity card.

I’m not sure even taken at face value this adds up. How often do you have to prove your identity using bank statements and bills? I can’t accurately remember the last time I need to do this. Maybe a couple of years ago when I opened a new bank account.

The control of data sounds useful, except the Government really doesn’t have a great track record for keeping personal information out of the wrong hands. Unless that personal information is MPs expense claims of course.

Limiting the ability of foreigners to claim benefits would be great. If it worked. But it won’t. If people are prepared to enter the UK hidden in shipping containers, in the back of lorries and other inconvenient (at best) methods, is the difficulty and legality of forging a ID card really going to deter them?

And lastly, a convenient way of travelling around Europe. You mean, like a Passport? I already have one of those. And a common way to get an ID Card is going to be… when you apply for a new passport. So I now have two documents instead of one. In what way is that convenient?

Okay, so some of these grumbles are “relative.” I may not be inconvenienced by proving my ID very often, but if it’s cheap it may be worth it. They say: “It is intended that the fee for a British citizen?s identity card issued in 2009 or 2010 will be ?30 or less.” So before the vast majority of the population get one it will be ?30 or less. There’s no indication of the costs after that, presumably because they don’t know what will go wrong with it. Or put another way: it will be more than ?30. If you think I’m being cynical, feel free to go away and Google for successful Government IT projects. I’ll wait.

They also say that “approximately 70% of this cost will need to be spent in any event to implement secure biometric passports.” So by their own numbers ID Cards will cost ?1435m ((“The latest (Nov 2008) estimated cost of the Service for the next 10 years is ?4,785m for UK citizens, including the issue of both passports and identity cards and ?326m for foreign nationals.”)).

That’s a lot of money to spend so you can travel to Europe using a different document than you usually use and avoid digging out a few utility bills every year or two.

So in conclusion, it’s expensive and won’t do what they say it will. What are ID Cards for again?

First Mac

I’ve started to get “into” Twitter, the micro-blogging site, in the last month or so. One trend that I picked up on is that of “hashtags” where you put a hash (pound) symbol followed by a word somewhere in your message. This makes is searchable. The most recent that I’ve participated in is #firstmac, for which my contribution was:

A white iBook G3, paid extra to get the 600Mhz version with the faster bus speed and an impossible-to-use-it -all 384Mb of memory

And that’s entirely true but I can’t tell the full story in 140 characters, hence this post.

The first Mac I ever used was at university. Durham wasn’t big on Macs but there were a few lying around in the labs. I always liked playing around with new toys and so I occasionally used one, if only to bring up a terminal to Telnet into the Unix server and check my email.

This was back in ’92 or ’93 and email was only accessible on the big Solaris and HP-UX servers. The timing also meant that PCs were on Windows 3.1 and so fairly basic. Using a Mac, an LC with a tiny colour screen if I remember correctly, at the time was pretty cool.

What I didn’t realise was that the sound on early nineties Macs was substantially more advanced than on PCs of the time. I found this out the hard and embarrassing way.

One day between lectures I made a bee-line for the LC and brought up the terminal application. The standard of my typing, then and now, is such that it usually takes several attempts to get the server name correct. The Mac would make a sound when it couldn’t find the server.

Except this time someone had changed the default system beep and replaced it with a thirty second long sound sample called “orgasm.”

Did I say that the speakers on that LC were surprisingly loud?

I don’t think I used a Mac again for nearly ten years.

“There are no Buddhist Computer Systems”

I recently went to a BCS talk entitled “Eight Significant Events in Computing.” In the question and answers session at the end, one attendee noted that most innovations were Western in general, from the USA in particular. There are a good number of exceptions but, okay. He continued: the result of a Capitalist system and not Communist or Fascist. Again, I’m not sure that this is entirely true.

But it was his final point that floored me: IT innovations were mostly Christian. A few confused looks made him clarify with the line, “There are no Buddhist Computer Systems.”

I’m not really sure what a Buddhist computer system would look like, but I came up with the following list that would possibly qualify:

  • The concept of karma means that every time the application crashes, next time it starts you get a new, useful feature
  • Processes that crash are reincarnated rather than restarted
  • Long running processes (dæmons) therefore are said to be in nirvana

Then again, I wasn’t convinced that we actually have Christian computer systems either. Surely a Christian system would have the following properties:

  • A vast user manual written by people who claim to have seen the software
  • And translated some time later into a kind of pidgin English
  • The first half of the manual would be about version 1.0 of the product, which users still claimed was absolutely accurate. Even the bits that contradicted those in version 2.0
  • Both versions, but especially version 1.0, often erased your hard-disk or deleted child processes
  • Whether erasing your hard-disk or deleting child processes is a bad thing or not is still hotly debated by some users
  • Although version 3.0 has been around for a while, many users still cling to earlier versions
  • Despite having a third of the market, users often claim that they are being persecuted by people using other software or no software at all

Can you think of any more?