<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photo-Book Results: Printing-1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zx81.org.uk/photography/photo-book-results-printing-1.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zx81.org.uk/photography/photo-book-results-printing-1.html</link>
	<description>Photography, opinions and other random ramblings by Stephen Darlington</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy Young</title>
		<link>http://www.zx81.org.uk/photography/photo-book-results-printing-1.html#comment-44346</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zx81.org.uk/photography/photo-book-results-printing-1.html#comment-44346</guid>
		<description>I got bitten by that, too. The default gamma in Mac OS X is 1.8, which gives brighter images than the 2.2 gamma typical of Windows machines (and most printers, apparently). What look bright on your MB will certainly turn up darker from the print-shop. 

I re-calibrated my MBP display, re-edited some pictures and had test prints made. The results are much more accurate now. As much as I like the brighter gamma under Mac OS X, I'm having to use "that other one". 

Good luck,

--- Eddy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got bitten by that, too. The default gamma in Mac OS X is 1.8, which gives brighter images than the 2.2 gamma typical of Windows machines (and most printers, apparently). What look bright on your MB will certainly turn up darker from the print-shop. </p>
<p>I re-calibrated my MBP display, re-edited some pictures and had test prints made. The results are much more accurate now. As much as I like the brighter gamma under Mac OS X, I&#8217;m having to use &#8220;that other one&#8221;. </p>
<p>Good luck,</p>
<p>&#8212; Eddy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
